Thursday, September 11, 2014

Policy Analysis Brief


The social problem being explored is domestic violence and violence against women. While women are directly impacted so are their family units. The children in the home are generally exposed to, witness and many times are abused themselves. Extended family and friends can be affected as they watch a loved one suffer and many times either feel, “it’s not their place, it’s a family affair” or reach out to help only to have the victim return to the abuser. They are impacted physically, emotionally and financially. The women in the house may face physical abuse and sexual abuse, verbal abuse, humiliation, degradation, financial abuse and find her relationships being controlled by the abuser. This results in, low self-esteem, depression, suicidal ideation, feelings of worthlessness, failure and other mental health related issues. Physical and sexual abuse can turn into serious medical issues such as losing sight in an eye, chronic genital issues, internal bleeding, organ failure, the list goes on.
Children witnessing this can experience the same mental health and emotional issues as well as PTSD, having an inability to make friends, suffering grades in school, drug and alcohol abuse and sexual promiscuity. Both groups experience trauma symptoms akin to PTSD even if they are never officially diagnosed. For those directly affected it means living in a situation that historically can become deadly if not by the hands of the abuser by other means meant to end the suffering such as suicide and risky behavior such as drug abuse.
Current laws protect children through DCF and therefore children affected may be removed from the home and put into foster homes. However foster children face many related issues including mistrust of the new family and an inability to let go of one family of origin. While current laws do protect the victim it is still in need of work. Men who commit violence against women, specifically domestic violence may be removed from the home over night only to be returned the next day. Once a case is built against them if the victim chose to move forward they could gain an order of protection, divorce papers and try the abuser for the crime.
However, social policy based around this issue is fairly new compared to other laws and in so steeped in gender inequality that many times justice is not served despite the legal backing. The biggest issue is that victims do not have a say in the laws or their protection, they are not being listened to in terms of what laws could do to better serve and protect women. This is because the government, (made up of mainly older, white, men), are defining what the issues is and how to solve it.
The Federal response to domestic violence or violence against women as a whole, came in the form of the Violence Against Women Act in 1994. Vice President Joe Biden recently released an excerpt in Time Magazine this past Tuesday discussing the Act and it’s primary concerns for the future, which is for, “the right of every woman in America to be free from violence and free from fear.” This is an exceptional start to another lengthy battle that is continuous, inescapable and affects women everyday.
            On a state level from the early 1980s people started to truly pay attention to the violent and intimidating actions being taken against women. In 1984, Sherman and Berk contributed to the turning point of this subject in recognizing violence against women as a real issue. In this study they saw that when the abuser was removed from the home via a legal arrest the domestic violence in that household and family unit decreased and was less likely to occur again. This was part of their six-series study, which was summarized as, “the arrest intervention certainly did not make things worse and may well have made things better (Doak, 2007,  p. 157).” What was exhibited in the study was that many times the victim did want to abuser out of their home and law enforcement generally took that into consideration during house call. “The victim’s desire to have the offender arrested (of victims who expressed such a desire, arrests were made in 44% of the cases; when the victim did not want the offender arrested, arrests were made in only 21% of the cases.” (Doak, 2007). While this is true and many times the best intervention for these cases is to remove the abuser and get the victim help before they return. Current federal laws are harsher on theft and non-violent crimes then that of a husband who abuses his wife daily.

Reference
Biden, J. (2014, September 10). 20 Years of Change: Joe Biden on the Violence Against Women Act. Retrieved September 11, 2014, from http://time.com/3319325/joe-biden-violence-against-women/

Caldwell, Phyllis. (2014). Understanding How Policy Charnges Affect Women in Poverty. How to Help Women Facing the Realities of Poverty. http://www.spotlightonpoverty.org/news.aspx?id=4a283578-aa22-4b69-9c6d-3e9e80c21167


Doak, M. (2007). Domestic Violence, Law Enforcement, and Court Responses to Domestic Violence. In Child abuse and domestic violence (pp. 147-165). Detroit:Thomson Gale.




Wednesday, September 10, 2014

The Affordable Care Act

http://www.patcameronconsulting.com/wp-content/media/three_gen_women_1.jpg
One of the biggest policies affecting women currently is the Affordable Care Act. Over the years it has become more intrusive to be a woman in the United States. From Roe VS Wade attempting to squelch the inability of women to attain needed abortions to women not being able to receive health care at all. It has become a disgusting quagmire for the individuals attempting to pass through laws and policies making things “right” again. What was particularly good about the Affordable HealthCare Act is that it didn’t allow insurance companies to discriminate against women as a whole. Particular medications would not cost more due to different parts of the body being affected. One of the biggest things the Act helped with was insurance companies being allowed to say whether or not they would take someone to begin with based on past issues. Although this affects men/women/trans people equally it particularly allows women who weren’t being given insurance in the midst of severe crises. According to Jay McDonald at BankRate, “22 percent of men who won't obtain health insurance cite opposition to the Affordable Care Act, compared with just 8 percent of women who plan to remain uninsured.” This number is still relatively low in my opinion because of the target audience’s not being reached. The individual clients I work with in domestic violence groups must be reminded all the time of things that they are afforded to. This is just a glimpse of a large population who is not directly reached by positive media outlets.

This particular act is just one thing that should be guaranteed to all people. The ability to attain healthcare that they can properly use. I completely understand that it is under a lot of scrutiny still about whether or not it is a right. If I assume that being a healthy individual is something substantial to better the rest of the country as a whole and be a more productive member of the society that we live in than I can safely and conservatively assume that it is a right and guarantee. 

Dolgen, E. (2013, November 15). The Affordable Care Act and Women: Three Things You Need to Know. Retrieved September 10, 2014, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ellen-sarver-dolgen/the-affordable-care-act-a_1_b_4275609.html

(n.d.). Retrieved September 10, 2014, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/files/documents/health_reform_for_women.pdf

McDonald, Jaay. (2014, March 17) Many uninsured still unaware about Obamacare. (2014, March 17). Retrieved September 10, 2014, from http://www.bankrate.com/finance/insurance/health-insurance-poll-0314.aspx


Friday, August 29, 2014

Social Policy Blog aimed at uncovering and discovering courses of action needed to be taken!!!